For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. This page is also available as Markdown.

Add a custom evaluator

Scorable provides evaluators that fit most needs, but you can add custom evaluators for specific needs. In this guide, we will add a custom evaluator and tune its performance using demonstrations.

Example: Weasel words

Consider a use case where you need to evaluate a text based on its number of weasel words or ambiguous phrases. Scorable provides the optimized Precision evaluator for this, but let's build something similar to go through the evaluator-building process.

  1. Navigate to the Evaluator Page:

    • Go to the evaluator page and click on "New Evaluator."

  2. Name Your Evaluator:

    • Type the name for the evaluator, for example, "Direct language."

  3. Define the Intent:

    • Give the evaluator an intent, such as "Ensures the text does not contain weasel words."

  4. Create the Prompt:

    • "Is the following text clear and has no weasel words"

  5. Add a placeholder (variable) for the text to evaluate:

    • Click on the "Add Variable" button to add a placeholder for the text to evaluate.

      • E.g., "Is the following text clear and has no weasel words: {{response}}"

  6. Select the Model:

    • Choose the model, such as gpt-5.5, for this evaluation.

  7. Save and Test the Evaluator:

Improve the custom evaluator performance

You can add demonstrations to the evaluator to tune its scores to match more closely to the desired behavior.

Example: Improve the Weasel words evaluator

Let's penalize using the word "probably"

  1. Go to the Weasel words evaluator and click Edit.

  2. In the Demonstrations section, click Add to open the demonstrations editor.

  3. Add a demonstration. For each example, fill in:

    • Response: "This solution will probably work for most users."

    • Request (optional): the input the response was produced for, when it matters for the evaluation.

    • Label: 👎 (thumbs down) — the response hedges with "probably", so it fails the check.

    • Justification (optional): a short note on why — for example, "Uses the hedging word 'probably'." The model reads the justification to learn the reasoning behind the label, which helps with ambiguous cases.

  4. Add more examples with Add example, or import several at once from a CSV. You can also select an existing labeled dataset instead of typing examples in.

  5. Save the demonstrations, then save the evaluator and try it out.

Note that adding more demonstrations, such as

  • "The project will probably be completed on time."

  • "We probably won't need to make any major changes."

  • "He probably knows the answer to your question."

  • "There will probably be a meeting tomorrow."

  • "It will probably rain later today."

will further adjust the evaluator's behavior. Refer to the full evaluator documentation for more information.

Once you have demonstrations tuned, the next step is verifying the evaluator is actually reliable. See Add a calibration set — including how to use the ladder algorithm to generate calibration examples automatically instead of hand-crafting them.\

Last updated